Skip to content
Launch Rail
Forms and intake operations

Turn every form into a managed workflow.

Submissions connects versioned form definitions, validated responses, file attachments, assignment state, labels, and operator follow-up in one source-owned service.

Inspect the published API contract

Submissions domain

Versioned intake workflow

Available · v1

Operational workspace

From customer input to an assigned operational outcome.

Form version published

Schema and presentation contract become the active intake

Live

Submission received

Payload, identity, tenant, and attachment references validated

New

Inbox assignment

Owner, labels, and workflow state added for operations

Assigned

Follow-up triggered

Status and notification workflow move the case forward

In review
Schema versionedFiles connectedInbox ready
Lifecycle
Available · v1
Interfaces
REST · Connect/gRPC · MCP via Agent Gateway
AWS path
Design-partner pilot
Commercial basis
Perpetual source license

Product outcome

Collecting data is easy. Operating the work that follows is the real product.

Customer intake rarely ends at a successful POST. Teams need to evolve forms, validate responses, attach files, assign owners, track status, and notify people without losing tenant or submitter context. Submissions keeps that lifecycle together.

01

Forms can evolve safely

Versioned schemas separate the current customer experience from historical responses.

02

Every response has context

Tenant, form version, submitter identity, attachments, and lifecycle state remain connected.

03

Operations receive a real queue

Assignments, labels, and status transitions turn raw responses into manageable work.

01 / Domain capabilities

A complete Submissions boundary, not a thin endpoint wrapper.

Each capability belongs to the same tenant-aware service contract and can be adapted in the licensed source.
01

Versioned form definitions

Define forms with JSON Schema, publish controlled versions, and keep historical submissions tied to the contract they used.

02

Validated submissions

Accept public or authenticated responses while retaining form, tenant, submitter, and idempotency context.

03

File-backed responses

Connect direct-to-cloud attachment workflows through Media instead of pushing file bytes through the form endpoint.

04

Operational inbox

Assign owners, apply labels, change status, and filter the queue through the published administration contract.

02 / Product workflow

One path from product intent to an enforceable result.

The overview stays business-readable. The documentation and published contract contain field-level detail.
  1. 01

    Publish the form

    Activate a versioned schema and presentation contract for the intended tenant or product surface.

  2. 02

    Receive the response

    Validate the payload and connect submitter identity, tenant context, and file references.

  3. 03

    Route the work

    Place the submission in an operational queue with status, labels, and an accountable owner.

  4. 04

    Close the loop

    Update the workflow, notify the right people, and retain the submission history for later review.

03 / Technical depth

Clear operational boundaries for the team that owns it.

Support is 12 months of updates and support. Deployment, updates, and customer-cloud responsibilities are reviewed before purchase.
Submit a form responseHTTP / JSON
POST /v1/public/forms/submissions
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "form_id": "partner_application",
  "idempotency_key": "request_8f4b",
  "payload": {
    "company": "Northline Systems",
    "email": "team@example.com"
  }
}

Schema and response store

Forms, published versions, submissions, status, assignment, and labels remain part of one product model.

Media handoff

Attachments use the Media workflow while Submissions retains the product relationship and attachment state.

Notification handoff

Submission events can drive acknowledgements and operational follow-up through Notifications.

04 / Where it fits

Submissions supports products with real tenant and commercial complexity.

These are product patterns, not customer case studies or measured outcomes.
Pattern 01

Customer onboarding

Collect structured applications and documents, assign an owner, and move each customer through an explicit review state.

Pattern 02

Case and request intake

Turn support, legal, property, or healthcare intake into tenant-aware queues instead of forwarding form emails.

Pattern 03

Internal operational forms

Publish evolving workflows for approvals, evidence collection, and follow-up while preserving the exact submitted version.

Ownership model

Own the service without owning every release problem.

The source license, update term, support boundary, and customer-cloud responsibilities remain explicit. Missing domain work can be scoped as a custom module instead of hidden in a roadmap promise.

01

Licensed Go source for forms and inbox workflows

02

Published REST and Connect/gRPC contract

03

Customer-controlled submission data and attachments

04

Optional form actions or domain queues scoped as custom work

Published API evidence active
Customer-cloud deployment path
Depends on identity, notifications, media

Submissions architecture review

Put Submissions behind a product boundary your team can own.

Bring the tenant model, workflow requirements, cloud target, and any missing module. We will map the service, its dependencies, and the delivery path before discussing a license.
Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions & Answers

Everything you need to know about integrating and hosting this Launch Rail service.